Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<9003722.1068713792137.JavaMail.www@wwinf0401>
From:	Stephane ALBIN <albin DOT stephane AT wanadoo DOT fr>
Reply-To:	albin DOT stephane AT wanadoo DOT fr
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Building shared objects
Mime-Version:	1.0
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:56:32 +0100 (CET)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id hAD8uhgs015713

Hi all,

I currently use cygwin 1.3.4.
I'm trying to build a shared object which uses another lib.

My object is named : mf.o
It uses the lib name : libHt.so
And for my test, they are in the same directory.

libHt.so has been generated by :
gcc -shared -o libHt.so Ht.o

If I do :
gcc -shared libHt.so mf.o -o libmf.so

I get this message :
libHt.so: fake: multiple definition of '___do_frame_init'
libHt.so: fake: multiple definition of '___do_frame_fini'
libHt.so: fake: multiple definition of '___EH_FRAME_BEGIN__'

I don't think it is a gcc problem because it works correctly on Linux with gcc 3.3.1.

If I link objects directly, it works :
gcc -shared -o libmf.so mf.o Ht.o
But I don't want this feature.

Any help is welcome.
TIA.
Stéphane Albin.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -