Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/11/09/21:20:37
Yeah,it seems all ok!
>On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:24:29PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:44:20AM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
>>>zhouxin wrote:
>>>>If the udp worker's count greater than 18,some thread's select() hang
>>>>and process take 100 cpu:
>>>
>>>Interestingly, there is a static pool of 18 threads internally before
>>>switching to dynamically created threads. So there may be some problem
>>>related to the dynamically allocated threads code.
>>
>>Hmm. Interesting observation. I took a stab at fixing a couple of
>>obvious problems in the thread overflow code. It seems like it might
>>have solved the problem.
>>
>>There will be a new snapshot available in an hour or so at:
>>
>>http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>>
>>Thanks for the test case, btw.
>
>So... did the snapshot fix the problem?
>
>cf
>
>--
>Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
>.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -