Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 8 Nov 2003 16:04:26 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	New tar available for testing (was Re: here is a patch for gnu tar incremental backup...)
Message-ID:	<20031108210426.GA5429@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<7662849 DOT 1067255132356 DOT JavaMail DOT cyyang AT brunch DOT mit DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<7662849.1067255132356.JavaMail.cyyang@brunch.mit.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 06:45:32AM -0500, George Carrette wrote:
>Here is a fix for gnu tar incremental backup feature
>for the most recent cygwin that uses a 64-bit value for 
>the type ion_t
>
>This was done against the sources in release/tar/tar-1.13.25-3-src.tar.bz2

Thanks for the patch but I don't think it is quite right and I don't think
it catches everything.

I'm uploading a new version of tar for testing now.  I'd appreciate feedback
(to the cygwin list) on whether it solves the reported problem.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -