| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Message-ID: | <20031108144026.41321.qmail@web20807.mail.yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 8 Nov 2003 06:40:26 -0800 (PST) |
| From: | Bill Priest <priestwilliaml AT yahoo DOT com> |
| Subject: | Building gcc on cygwin w/ Herman Ten Brugge's bounds checking patch |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
All, I've built gcc w/ the bounds checking patch on Linux and solaris and am trying to build it on cygwin (w/ the cygwin modified source from setup). With tweak to one file I've been able to get it to bootstrap w/o any errors and the resulting C compiler will work w/o specifying "-fbounds-checking". But I get a seg fault when specifying "-fbounds-checking". Has anyone been able to build gcc w/ this patch?? I'm sure the problem is parts of the patch that don't apply cleanly vs. the cygwin patches. Regards, Bill __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |