Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs
Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:45:09 -0500 (EST)
From:	Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	Vince Rice <vr8ce AT yahoo DOT com>
cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: wtfindex produces corrupt files on DOS mounts
In-Reply-To:	<20031105172118.71332.qmail@web21504.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.56.0311051241330.20014@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References:	<20031105172118 DOT 71332 DOT qmail AT web21504 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Importance:	Normal
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Vince Rice wrote:

> --- Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu> wrote:
> > Vince,
> >
> > Thanks for the report.  It would have been great if you also
> > specified the version of wtf that you used.  However, I've just
> > reproduced this with wtf-0.0.4-4.  Expect a new release soon.
>
> My apologies.  I did try to figure out the version, but I couldn't
> find anything that would tell me.  There appears to be only one
> command line switch (-a), it wasn't in the man page, I tried cygcheck
> wtf, and I tried an old filever utility I have on the wtf.exe itself.
>  While I'm typing it occurs to me I could have run through setup and
> let it tell me...  I know this is a lean and mean program, but would
> you consider supporting command line options -v or --version in wtf
> itself?

That's up to the upstream maintainer.  I'll suggest it to him.

> I just did the setup thing, and it is indeed 0.0.4-4 that I have as
> well.  Thanks for the quick fix!
>
> Vince
>
> P.S. -- I got to thinking about how setup knew, so I poked around
> some more on cygcheck and found that cygcheck -c told me the
> information as well.  So now I'll know for next time.  However,
> supporting -v or --version in the program itself would still be nice. :)

That's exactly what cygcheck is for.  If you don't want it to do integrity
checking, you can give it a -d (dump-only) option in addition to -c, and
it'll simply query the installed package version (which may be different
from any particular executable's version, BTW, although not in case of
wtf).  Another place to look would be /usr/share/doc/Cygwin for
wtf*.README.  The version on that file should correspond to the package
version.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -