Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Hannu E K Nevalainen" <garbage_collector AT telia DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Problems building cygwin from source
Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:36:46 +0100
Message-ID:	<NGBBLLIAMFLGJEOAJCCEKEAFDGAA.garbage_collector@telia.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<02c601c3a32c$9b1fd8f0$4900a8c0@lisa>

> From: Peter J. Stieber
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:37 AM

<SNIP>
> > ../src/configure --prefix=/usr/install --enable-debugging -v
> >        ^
> >   no 'winsup'
>
> Thanks Chris,
>
> I think I foolishly picked this up from some misinformation in the mailing
> list thread "Can't build cygwin from CVS: configure error", but the
> documentation on http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC104 is
> perfectly clear.
> Just didn't notice the difference myself.
>
> Thanks again,
> Pete

 IIRC, that thread had at least one specific cause; there was a temporary
cvs (databease?) error. This error caused the "top" configure to not appear
after an initial cvs checkout (i.e. on an empty /src dir).

 Reading the docs and FAQ is essential, though beeing a bit sparse at times
they still are correct - in hindsight.
I've been fighting this sparseness to some extent ;-)  (HI CGF!)

In telecom terms; IMO there needs to be a slight redundancy in the data
transmitted via the docs. Thus allowing for error checking and possibly even
correction on errors.

 In general terms this means; add a word or two after a group of
instructions to tell what the outcome of the instruction group _should_ give
as result.

And for CGF; this was NOT a "the docs are bad" inlay, it was one that
lobbies for improvements. ;-)

/Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE - 59?16.37'N, 17?12.60'E
-- printf("LocalTime: UTC+%02d\n",(DST)? 2:1); --
--END OF MESSAGE--


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -