Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:58:45 +0100
From:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Reply-To:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Organization:	Esse keine toten Tiere
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<4623962140.20031104165845@familiehaase.de>
To:	Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
CC:	CygWin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
In-Reply-To:	<3FA7C328.7070801@lapo.it>
References:	<bnr72n$li9$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
	<157-1772867639 DOT 20031030154714 AT familiehaase DOT de> <bo67ls$gv8$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
	<15820826718 DOT 20031104160630 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3FA7C328 DOT 7070801 AT lapo DOT it>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hello Lapo,

Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 4:18:00 PM, you wrote:

> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

>>Interesting, it is really a little faster when libstdc++ is directly
>>compared with the STLport library.  So it would make sense to use it when
>>performance is an issue.
>>  
>>
> I guess it is smaller, too, the stdlibc++ not being shared.
> (or it is, now? I forgot to check before clicking "send" ;) )

Unfortunately the shared STLport library doesn't work, at least in this
case.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerrit 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -