Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3FA7C328.7070801@lapo.it>
Date:	Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:18:00 +0100
From:	Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language:	it, en, fr, es
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Mailing List: CygWin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
References:	<bnr72n$li9$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <157-1772867639 DOT 20031030154714 AT familiehaase DOT de> <bo67ls$gv8$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <15820826718 DOT 20031104160630 AT familiehaase DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<15820826718.20031104160630@familiehaase.de>
X-Enigmail-Version:	0.76.7.0
X-Enigmail-Supports:	pgp-inline, pgp-mime

Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

>Interesting, it is really a little faster when libstdc++ is directly
>compared with the STLport library.  So it would make sense to use it when
>performance is an issue.
>  
>
I guess it is smaller, too, the stdlibc++ not being shared.
(or it is, now? I forgot to check before clicking "send" ;) )

-- 
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -