Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:06:30 +0100
From:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Reply-To:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Organization:	Esse keine toten Tiere
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<15820826718.20031104160630@familiehaase.de>
To:	"Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT connect DOT to>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re[2]: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
In-Reply-To:	<bo67ls$gv8$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<bnr72n$li9$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
	<157-1772867639 DOT 20031030154714 AT familiehaase DOT de> <bo67ls$gv8$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hello Alex,

Monday, November 3, 2003, 7:44:16 PM, you wrote:


> "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de> wrote in message
> news:157-1772867639 DOT 20031030154714 AT familiehaase DOT de...
>> Alex wrote:
>>
>> > An algorithm which computes very long Fibonacci numbers
>> >
>> >
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=bnni5p%2412i47o%241%40ID-79865.news.uni-berlin.de
>> >   was used as a performance testsuite
>> >   to compare speed of the code produced by various compilers.
>>
>> >
>> |------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> > |               Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler, STLport 4.5.3
>> >
>> |------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> > | Version 8.35n        | -   | 0.20 : 0.16 | 0.84 : 0.80 |  3.82 :  3.74 |
>> >
>> |========================================================================|
>>
>>
>> Do you think to use STLport with the Cygwin/MinGW compiler would
>> increase perfomance?

> [snip]
> New report which contains STLport with the Cygwin has been posted
> to news:gmane.os.cygwin under title "C++ Compilers : Comparative
> Performance Measurement".
> See :
> * news://news.gmane.org/bo66qu$eo1$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
> * http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/40086.

Interesting, it is really a little faster when libstdc++ is directly
compared with the STLport library.  So it would make sense to use it when
performance is an issue.


-- 
Best regards,
 Gerrit


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -