Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:58:13 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
Message-ID:	<20031103195813.GB10195@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<bnr72n$li9$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <157-1772867639 DOT 20031030154714 AT familiehaase DOT de> <bo67ls$gv8$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<bo67ls$gv8$1@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:44:16PM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote:
>New report which contains STLport with the Cygwin has been posted to
>news:gmane.os.cygwin under title "C++ Compilers : Comparative
>Performance Measurement".

Have you missed the fact that the cygwin mailing list is the same thing
as gmane.os.cygwin?  There's no reason to notify the mailing list about
this.
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -