delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/10/31/13:58:34

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:58:19 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin deadlocks due to lack of money
Message-ID: <20031031185819.GD5551@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CDDF0C56FD28F74CA268185D6EABD63302CAA443 AT i2km38-ukdy DOT domain1 DOT systemhost DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CDDF0C56FD28F74CA268185D6EABD63302CAA443@i2km38-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 06:13:17PM -0000, kevin DOT lawton AT bt DOT com wrote:
>Okay, I spent some time looking at the mailing list archives but found
>nothing which added anything to this discussion.  I would have hoped
>that my intended offer of use of an Athlon 64 system would have counted
>as more than just 'idle curiosity' and, anyway, I'm never 'idle'.

I interpreted your response as nonserious since you seemed to be
humorously suggesting that we'd be working on a version of cygwin for
linux, which is obviously nonsensical.  I thought it was self evident
that I was talking about getting cygwin working on a 64 bit version of
windows and didn't seriously think that you were suggesting that we were
thinking about getting cygwin working on some other system.  I guess
I was wrong.

>BTW My plan was to either test for you (under direction) or make the
>machine available to you via some sort of terminal server and my ADSL
>connection.  I didn't fancy having it transported.  I did actually want
>to contribute something to the cygwin project, as I've found it so
>valuable over the past couple of years.  Shame you weren't interested.

Actually, while I appreciate that you wanted to contribute something,
I'm not interested in either scenario.  The effort of working on cygwin
remotely either by having someone else do testing (especially when the
someone doesn't really know cygwin internals) or by logging in over
the internet was not what I was looking for.  Having a system sitting
in my office that I could hack on when the mood hit me was more of what
I was looking for.

I wasn't seriously suggesting that anyone was going to send me a 64-bit
system, either.

Here's the kind of google search term I would have used to find
discussion:

64-bit windows cygwin site:cygwin.com cgf

This was my first tray and it unearths some discussion as the first hit.
I'm sure that there are search refinements possible but, to answer your
aggrieved question, all of the discussions basically revolve around
someone reporting that cygwin doesn't work right in some beta or release
candidate version of windows for 64 bit platforms and my suggesting that
the problem won't be solved until I (or Corinna or Pierre) have a 64 bit
system to hack on.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019