Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:47:14 +0100
From:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>
Reply-To:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>
Organization:	Esse keine toten Tiere
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<157-1772867639.20031030154714@familiehaase.de>
To:	"Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT connect DOT to>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
In-Reply-To:	<bnr72n$li9$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<bnr72n$li9$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Alex wrote:

> An algorithm which computes very long Fibonacci numbers
>  
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=bnni5p%2412i47o%241%40ID-79865.news.uni-berlin.de
>   was used as a performance testsuite
>   to compare speed of the code produced by various compilers.

> |------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |               Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler, STLport 4.5.3         
> |------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> | Version 8.35n        | -   | 0.20 : 0.16 | 0.84 : 0.80 |  3.82 :  3.74 |
> |========================================================================|


Do you think to use STLport with the Cygwin/MinGW compiler would
increase perfomance?


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=                                     http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -