Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/10/28/10:02:39
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 01:57:19PM +0100, Alexander Schremmer wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:03:24 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:41:02AM +0100, Alexander Schremmer wrote:
>>>
>>> /---- [JFYI - Sending mail to cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com:] -------------------\
>>> | <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>: |
>>> | Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) |
>>> \---------------------------------------------------------------------/
>>
>> This is intended. Please keep replies on list. Don't send private email.
>
>but why does Christopher Faylor send his reply to my address as well? And
>why doesn't he use something like *@*.invalid but breaks RFC by supplying
>an syntactically correct but not connected address?
>How about creating an auto-responder noreply AT cygwin DOT com? This situation is
>rather confusing.
Not only is it confusing, but it is off-topic. Your inability to comply
with my wishes (by setting Reply-To) that you reply to the cygwin
mailing list is really not a subject for the mailing list.
I cc'ed you because 1) I did not see your name in the subscriber list so I
thought that it was likely that you would not see my reply and 2) you did
not set a reply-to indicating your preference.
Since you didn't seem to like my doing this, I have refrained from cc'ing
you in this email since you have indicated a preference. I would ask that
you just adhere to my preference as well.
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -