Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:52:44 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: undefined reference to `_getline'
Message-ID:	<20031024045244.GB29905@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D0130DE48 AT exchange DOT timesys DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D0130DE48@exchange.timesys.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 12:45:08AM -0400, Robb, Sam wrote:
>>Yes - I found this almost immediately.  My concern is that it *looks*
>>like getline() is available, but it isn't.
>
>...  and, it looks like the same situation for pread() in <unistd.h>
>
>Grump.

I suppose that in all of your searching you never came across the
concept that cygwin uses newlib and that cygwin does not export every
single thing from newlib?  That means that there are some things defined
in headers which are not actually available in cygwin.

If you find that unconvincing, then yes.  We'e just doing this because
we don't like you and we're very mean.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -