delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3F95CABC.3563CECE@dessent.net> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:09:32 -0700 |
From: | Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net> |
Organization: | My own little world... |
X-Accept-Language: | en,en-US |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: pwd option to return windows path |
References: | <20031021230957 DOT GA1071 AT mdssirds DOT comp DOT pge DOT com> <20031021232613 DOT GB7132 AT redhat DOT com> <3F95C2ED DOT EFB00C74 AT dessent DOT net> <20031021235015 DOT GA1229 AT mdssirds DOT comp DOT pge DOT com> |
X-AntiAbuse: | This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report |
X-AntiAbuse: | Primary Hostname - host.linuxsv3.net |
X-AntiAbuse: | Original Domain - cygwin.com |
X-AntiAbuse: | Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] |
X-AntiAbuse: | Sender Address Domain - dessent.net |
Note-from-DJ: | This may be spam |
Edward Peschko wrote: > > > There is no option. > > > > If your "terse cgf reply decoder ring" has not yet arrived, you may be > > interested in "man cygpath", e.g. "cygpath -w `pwd`". > > yeah, I did a little more mucking around and came up with cygpath. Its not the most > obvious place to find that information though, nothing in unix screams out 'cygpath is > what you want!!!' since there *are* no unix analogs. I think that the same options that > are on cygpath should also be on pwd; this might make things a little more user friendly. You will quickly find that the Cygwin motto is that things are the way they are because the developers are just mean. Not being one of them, I can't really read their minds but I would imagine this has come to be after fielding way too many questions on the mailing lists that boil down to "Cygwin isn't doing what I thought it should", or some permutation thereof. In their defense, I should point out that this one is covered in the FAQ: <http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#SEC37> Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |