Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Analyze:	Velop Mail Shield v0.0.3
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:30:04 -0300 (BRT)
From:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_L=2E_W=2E_Meunier?= <1 AT pervalidus DOT net>
X-X-Sender:	fredlwm AT pervalidus DOT dyndns DOT org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	--disable-checking in GCC ?
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0310132325380.22287@pervalidus.dyndns.org>
X-Archive:	encrypt
MIME-Version:	1.0

I read it makes significant differences for compile times when
GCC is configured with --disable-checking, but 3.3.1-2 doesn't
return it with gcc -v. Does it make any difference on Cygwin ?
It certainly does on Linux.

-- 
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -