| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| From: | Andrew DeFaria <ADeFaria AT Salira DOT com> |
| Subject: | Re: Error: procedure entry point _getreent could not be located... |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:25:08 -0700 |
| Lines: | 24 |
| Message-ID: | <bmfc3e$q96$2@sea.gmane.org> |
| References: | <20031013223428 DOT 68740 DOT qmail AT web41314 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0310131742521 DOT 791 AT eos> |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
| X-Accept-Language: | en-us, en |
| In-Reply-To: | <Pine.GSO.4.56.0310131742521.791@eos> |
Brian Ford wrote: >On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Ravi Malghan wrote: > > >>Hi: I recently added lynx to existing cygwin installation. When installing Lynx, I noticed it installed a new version of perl. Now when I try to run perl, I get the error: "procedure entry point _getreent could not be located in the dynamic link library cygwin1.dll" >> >>What do I have to do to resolve this. Thanks in advance. >>Ravi >> >> >You might try including cygcheck output as directed in http://cygwin.com/problems.html. > >My WAG, perl needs Cygwin 1.5.5 and you have 1.3.22 or older. Did you update the Cygwin DLL too? > I do remember somethign about that entrypoint and 1.5.5. However, if installing lynx required the new perl and the perl was dependent on cygwin1.dll 1.5.5 then shouldn't setup have handled such a dependency chain? (Just curious...) -- When something is "new and improved!". Which is it? If it's new, then there has never been anything before it. If it's an improvement, then there must have been something before it. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |