Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:56:49 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: results of compiling berkeleydb
Message-ID:	<20031013045649.GA15683@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20031013010344 DOT GA18830 AT mdssirds DOT comp DOT pge DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20031013010344.GA18830@mdssirds.comp.pge.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:03:44PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
>Ok, I did as requested, and tried to compile berkeleydb with
>-mno-cygwin.  Results are below, along with some
>thoughts/reflections....

Hint:

GCC='gcc -mno-cygwin' ./configure.

AFAICT, this won't get you a windows version of db with the unpatched
sources (since it seems like you need to use a special windows configure
script which defines DB_WIN32 to do that), but it should at least get
you closer to that goal.

The bottom line is that you were using the tools incorrectly.  Didn't
someone suggest doing more research before posting?  Sounds like good
advice to me.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -