Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/10/05/01:10:44
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 08:15:56PM -0700, Jim Kleckner wrote:
>I see. You only appeared to invite investigation. This gcc
>announcement page that I referenced in my first email said nothing
>about gcj or java problems. http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/changes.html I
>did substantial searching, downloading and recompiling. But all you
>can do is to write it off with a flip comment.
>
>These kinds of responses are very discouraging to people who want to
>help.
You seemed to be puzzled that java wasn't working. I pointed to the
announcement that indicated the state of java. If you only read the
latest announcement which indicated that it was a "very minor refresh"
then you wouldn't have seen the above message. However, the "very minor
refresh" phrase could have also triggered a "Hmm. I wonder what this is
a minor refresh of" type of inquiry.
I point these kind of things out so that, in the future, if you are
researching problems like this, you will know where to search.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -