delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/09/30/13:51:51

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:51:22 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-3.2: gcc driver doesn't pick up crt0.a from /usr/lib
Message-ID: <20030930175122.GB30878@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3F79C1DF DOT 4040608 AT mvista DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3F79C1DF.4040608@mvista.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:48:15AM -0700, Doru Carastan wrote:
>This is a followup to my "gcc-3.2: gcc driver doesn't pick up crt0.a 
>from /usr/lib" message.
>
>I have found that configure sets GCC_FOR_TARGET to the cross-compiler I 
>use in the root Makefile.
>
>GCC_FOR_TARGET = i686-pc-cygwin-gcc
>
>Then gcc/Makefile is using it to create the spec file
>
>specs: xgcc$(exeext)
>    $(GCC_FOR_TARGET) -dumpspecs > tmp-specs
>    mv tmp-specs specs
>
>and obviously the spec file defines:
>
>*cross_compile:
>1
>
>which makes gcc drop /lib and /usr/lib from the 'libraries:' search path.
>
>IMO this is wrong considering that the configure line was:
>
>"$r/src/$gcc/configure" --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu \
>  --host=i686-pc-cygwin --target=i686-pc-cygwin \
>  --prefix=/usr --includedir=/nonexistent/include \
>  --enable-languages=c,c++ \
>  --enable-threads=posix \
>  --with-system-zlib \
>  --enable-nls \
>  --without-included-gettext \
>  --disable-version-specific-runtime-libs \
>  --enable-shared \
>  --enable-haifa \
>  --enable-interpreter
>
>Can someone shed some light here? Why GCC_FOR_TARGET is not left as 
>defined in the gcc/Makefile?
>
>GCC_FOR_TARGET = ./xgcc -B./ -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/ -isystem 
>$(build_tooldir)/include -isystem $(build_tooldir)/sys-include

The gcc mailing list is a more appropriate place for these types of
questions.  gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org.
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019