Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Andrew DeFaria <ADeFaria AT Salira DOT com>
Subject:	ftp way quicker than cp?
Date:	Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:16:24 -0700
Lines:	28
Message-ID:	<bl4k23$69n$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en

Ftp is orders of magnitude quicker than cp. Here's the situation.

File to copy: 25 Meg.
 From location: Santa Clara, USA.
To location: Shanghai, China
Network connection: Not really sure but both Santa Clara and Shanghai 
are in the same NT domain.

I tried the following:

$ time ncftpput sons-cc Release 2.2.0.7.images.tar.gz
2.2.0.7.images.tar.gz:                                  25.99 MB   81.70 
kB/s 

real    5m34.187s
user    0m0.327s
sys     0m1.124s
$ time cp 2.2.0.7.images.tar.gz //sons-shanghai/users/ftp/release

real    133m39.290s
user    0m1.186s
sys     0m7.406s

Why such a huge difference! Had I thought that such a huge difference 
would have occurred I would have switched to ftp long ago!
===
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -