Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:45:07 +0200
From:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Reply-To:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Organization:	Esse keine toten Tiere
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<15334716930.20030923214507@familiehaase.de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: FYI: bladeenc - fairly easy port.
In-Reply-To:	<NGBBLLIAMFLGJEOAJCCECEHIDEAA.garbage_collector@telia.com>
References:	<NGBBLLIAMFLGJEOAJCCECEHIDEAA DOT garbage_collector AT telia DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hannu schrieb:

> Approximate speed difference:
>  -O2 runs 1.75x speed
>  -O0 runs 0.75x speed (P2/450!)
>  -O0: "All operations completed. Total encoding time: 00:47:46"
>  -O2: "All operations completed. Total encoding time: 00:20:04"

I guess it will be faster when using a native Windows (non Cygwin based)
version.  Is there also a Windows port available?  How fast is it
compared with the Cygwin version?


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -