Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Analyze:	Velop Mail Shield v0.0.3
Date:	Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:38:52 -0300 (E. South America Standard Time)
From:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_L=2E_W=2E_Meunier?= <0 AT pervalidus DOT tk>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	checking for shmat in -lipc... no
Message-ID:	<Pine.WNT.4.58.0309211431520.160@pervalidus>
X-X-Sender:	fredlwm AT imap DOT fastmail DOT fm
MIME-Version:	1.0

While running configure for IceWM (I don't think it's a
question for cygwin-xfree) I noticed the following:

checking for shmat... no
checking for shmat in -lipc... no

The second test returned yes when I created libipc.a and
libipc.dll.a symlinks.

What's the right procedure for this test, which should be
present in other packages ? Ignore ? Create symlinks ? Change
configure.in ?

-- 
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -