Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT connect DOT to>
Subject:	Re: objdump : inaccurate demangling for foo(char* const)
Date:	Sat, 20 Sep 2003 09:17:42 +0300
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<bkgrek$eje$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<bkdtn1$597$2 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <bkfh75$v8o$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

"Rolf Campbell" <Endlisnis AT mailc DOT net> wrote in message news:bkfh75$v8o$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org...
> foo(char* const) is no different from foo(char*), from the perspective
> of linking/overloading.
>
> Did you mean foo(char const *)?
>

I meant foo(char* const). not foo(char const *).
Thanks.

   =====================================
   Alex Vinokur
     mailto:alexvn AT connect DOT to
     http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
   =====================================




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -