Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3F6AF46A.7070107@fillmore-labs.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:19:54 +0200
From:	Patrick Eisenacher <eisenacher AT fillmore-labs DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ssh-keygen and slogin oddity
X-Authenticated-Sender:	eisenacher AT fillmore-labs DOT com
User-Agent:	KMail/1.5.9
Organization:	Fillmore Labs GmbH <http://www.fillmore-labs.com/>
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT fillmore-labs DOT com

Corinna,

do you have any reference for this?

Unless this is something inherent in the ssh protocol or its 
implementation, which I'm not familiar with, I'm not aware that crypto 
systems based on discrete logarithms (DSA) are less secure than those 
based on factoring large integers (RSA).

FWIW:
- RSA verifies much faster than DSA, whereas DSA signs faster than RSA
- RSA can also be used for en-/decryption, whereas DSA can not
- RSA was patented in the USA, but the patent ran out in the meantime
- strong encryption crypto (eg RSA) was export restricted from the US, 
but this restriction was deregulated


Patrick

Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
[snip]
> Another btw., don't use DSA if you can avoid it.  Create your own
> RSA ssh2 key with ssh-keygen -t rsa.  It's supposed to be more secure
> than DSA keys.
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -