Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:35:15 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: setvbuf/setlinebuf issue
Message-ID:	<20030917213515.GB24080@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0309171252030 DOT 7396 AT eos>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.56.0309171252030.7396@eos>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:57:10PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
>Jan Jaeger wrote here:
>
>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-09/msg01159.html
>
>> The issue appears related to the use of the pthread library, where is
>> almost appears if every thread now has its own streams buffer, rather
>> then a shared buffer as the threading model dictates.
>>
>This problem appears analogous to the at_exit problem in newlib fixed by
>Thomas Pfaff here:
>
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2003/msg00527.html
>
>I assume a similar fix is in order, but I don't currently have to time to
>cook one up and test it.  Is anyone else game?

Except that, I thought that Thomas already fixed this in newlib some time
ago.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -