Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id:	<5.1.0.14.0.20030916145034.02844008@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender:
Date:	Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:56:53 -0400
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Upgrading Cygwin - postinstall difficulties?
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.56.0309161234390.12411@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References:	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20030916121320 DOT 026286d0 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1>
	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20030916121320 DOT 026286d0 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 12:40 PM 9/16/2003, Igor Pechtchanski you wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Larry Hall wrote:
>
>> At 11:37 AM 9/16/2003, Andrew DeFaria you wrote:


<snip>



>> >
>> >Now the situation is understandable. The question is: Did the
>> >postinstall script accomplish what it needed? After I reboot can I be
>> >assured that the "failed" postinstall script did enough of what it
>> >needed to do? Or should I re-execute (all) postinstall scripts?
>>
>> At least for now, to be sure that things worked properly, you'd need to
>> rerun the postinstall scripts after the new DLL has been put in place.
>> Either that or exit all Cygwin processes (including services) and rerun
>> setup reinstalling all the packages you just installed.
>>
>> You're correct that this is not an issue specific to the 1.5.x upgrade
>> process.
>>
>> --
>> Larry Hall
>
>Larry,
>
>I'd like to reiterate a warning that even a reinstall might not bring the
>system into a stable state if postinstall scripts were only partially
>executed.  I'm perfectly willing to give examples of situations where this
>will be true, but don't want to pollute the list unless there's general
>interest.
>
>Andrew's suggestion about delaying postinstall scripts until reboot sounds
>reasonable (or at least as reasonable as my suggestion of letting the user
>kill processes and retrying the replacement).  The current setup *is*
>broken in that regard.
>    Igor


I don't disagree with your statements Igor.  I actually sent my response
well before yours arrived in my mailbox.  I don't know why it took so long
for mine to filter through the list.  No matter.  Anyway, if I had seen your 
response before I sent mine, I wouldn't have bothered, since yours is a more
complete reply.


--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -