Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3F6355D3.8090704@msu.edu>
Date:	Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:37:23 -0400
From:	Harold L Hunt II <huntharo AT msu DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030827
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Still getting Signal 11 error msg
References:	<000b01c37a18$e7689360$9e7b2852 AT leper> <3F6350C4 DOT 5030000 AT msu DOT edu> <20030913172940 DOT GB21878 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20030913172940.GB21878@redhat.com>
X-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.3 required=6.8
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,
	USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.44

That's what I get for replying to email from bed on a Saturday morning.

Harold

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:15:48PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> 
>>Don't send these messages to the Cygwin maiiling list.  That will only 
>>lead to them ignoring you if you later have a legitimate question.
> 
> 
> Hmm.  AFAICT, this discussion does belong in both groups until we narrow
> down what is causing the crash.
> 
> 
>>You say you are getting a "Signal 11" error message, but I don't see a 
>>reference to which program is actually crashing.
> 
> 
> Previous email mentions that the program in question is xdvi.  It even
> received confirmation, right here in cygwin-xfree.  However neither of
> the previous messages nor this message are going to help much since
> there is no accompanying information about the environment in which the
> crashes occur.  This is why the standard response is to direct people to
> the problems page where attaching cygcheck output is suggested.
> 
> Attaching cygcheck output is something that Fergus has seemed reluctant
> to do.  The cygwin problems page also has a lot of tips for reporting
> problems, one of which is to not send email with vague subjects.
> 
> I have already requested that the xdvi package maintainer jump into
> this discussion so maybe they will have some insight.
> 
> cgf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -