Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:49:11 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: package _version_ check
Message-ID:	<20030909194911.GA10132@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<uoextu8i3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <022501c37704$6276c030$a62d8751 AT starfruit> <ud6e9sqbq DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<ud6e9sqbq.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
>it would be very nice if the above packages were re-built against 1.5

Pay attention.  There is no need to rebuild packages against 1.5.  Old
applications work fine modulo the usual bugs that crop in with any new
release.  The hoopla and concern about 1.5.x is just FUD.

>I am getting spurious failures, and I would love to have them fixed.

"spurious failures", eh?  Yeah, we'll get right on that.
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -