Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:23:31 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] NEW: mingw-zlib-1.1.4-4
Message-ID:	<20030908142331.GB5065@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030907084832 DOT E3F556C749 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0309081000100 DOT 7348 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.56.0309081000100.7348@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:01:14AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>This is good for a temp measure, but wouldn't this normally go into the
>mingw-runtime and gcc-mingw packages?  Or is this going to be a separate
>package forever and ever?

I don't mean to speak for Chuck but, after some discussion, it's
intended to be a separate package.  The intent was to not put a zlib
directory in winsup, which would be the case with mingw-runtime.  Ditto
for the gcc sources.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -