Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2003 14:04:47 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: latest cygcheck -c is expensive
Message-ID:	<20030905180446.GI1852@tishler.net>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030905124047 DOT GD1852 AT tishler DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0309051113580 DOT 26266 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.56.0309051113580.26266@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

Igor,

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:44:31AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> Problem reports will then have to include the output of "cygcheck
> -scnver", but, IMO, this is worth the fine-grained control over what's
> printed by cygcheck.
> Opinions?

The above sounds good to me.

Thanks,
Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -