Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2003 14:03:30 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: latest cygcheck -c is expensive
Message-ID:	<20030905180330.GH1852@tishler.net>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030905124047 DOT GD1852 AT tishler DOT net> <20030905150729 DOT GD1320 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030905150729.GD1320@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:07:29AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:40:47AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Would you be willing to make the status check portion of cygcheck -c
> >optional (i.e., another option)?  The latest version is very expensive:
> >
> >[snip]
> 
> Why does it matter if cygcheck -c is expensive?  It is supposed to be
> doing a sanity check on the installation.

In the past, it just displayed the package versions.  Since most of the
time I'm only interested in the package version, I would prefer that the
sanity check be optional.

FWIW, rpm seems to separate the query and verify operations:

    $ rpm -q textutils
    textutils-2.0.11-7
    $ rpm -V textutils
    $

Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -