Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3F562A2D.9040507@cs.york.ac.uk>
Date:	Wed, 03 Sep 2003 18:51:41 +0100
From:	chris <caj AT cs DOT york DOT ac DOT uk>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: DDD 3.3.5 success
References:	<20030903082916 DOT 83503 DOT qmail AT web13203 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <20030903133447 DOT GD9575 AT redhat DOT com> <001c01c37230$da38d460$6a567481 AT biosci DOT utexas DOT edu> <20030903174720 DOT GA9457 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20030903174720.GA9457@redhat.com>
X-Scanner:	exiscan *19ubnC-0001NA-TH*NPHabzTyrYA*

Christopher Faylor wrote:

>On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:34:24AM -0500, james wrote:
>  
>
>>>The typical response to ddd problems is "Why not just use 'insight'?"
>>>      
>>>
>>that's kind of like saying, "why not just use windows?" i think it's fairly
>>obvious that users would like to have the choice.
>>    
>>
>
>Most of the time when people ask this question they don't even
>know that a graphical debugger comes with the gdb distribution.
>  
>
Could I just add to this, I perfer ddd to insight by quite a lot, so 
that is why I would like ddd in cygwin :)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -