Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Shankar Unni <shankar AT cotagesoft DOT com>
Subject:	Re: basename(), dirname(), what happened?
Date:	Mon, 01 Sep 2003 18:49:42 -0700
Lines:	7
Message-ID:	<bj0svm$tva$2@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<181672454899 DOT 20030826123033 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20030829100633 DOT GH614 AT emcb DOT co DOT uk> <126165476933 DOT 20030829122848 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20030829112004 DOT GO614 AT emcb DOT co DOT uk> <20030901091036 DOT GA22657 AT linux_rln DOT harvest>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (Compact)
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
In-Reply-To:	<20030901091036.GA22657@linux_rln.harvest>

But all silliness aside, there's a very good point to the seeming
extremes that the Cygwin project in particular, and the FSF in general,
go in order to protect the code base by ensuring the true freedom of
their sources.

I give you the Linux mess, as exhibit #1.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -