Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3F4AEEEA.6020401@t-online.de>
Date:	Tue, 26 Aug 2003 07:23:54 +0200
From:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Markus_Sch=F6nhaber?= <mks99 AT t-online DOT de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030824
X-Accept-Language:	de-de, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: sorry about the spam
References:	<20030826024935 DOT GA5661 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20030826024935.GA5661@redhat.com>

http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20030821.html

Regards
   mks


Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I just checked in a new version of the spam blocker which worked well in
> testing but died a horrible death in production.
> 
> Sorry about the spam/viruses that came through.
> 
> cgf
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 
> 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -