Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:05:39 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: ash 20020731-3 and/or cygwin 1.5.2 directory vs. executable problem
Message-ID:	<20030811190539.GO3101@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20030811180612 DOT GB1136 AT tishler DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030811180612.GB1136@tishler.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:06:13PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> ash 20020731-3 and/or cygwin 1.5.2 gets confused by a directory and an
> executable of the "same" name:
> 
>     $ mkdir ls
>     $ cp /usr/bin/ls.exe .
>     $ sh -c ./ls
>     ./ls: not found
> 
> Note this works under (the 32-bit) ash 20020731-1 and cygwin 1.5.2:
> 
>     $ sh -c ./ls
>     ls  ls.exe
> 
> Since the source of ash 20020731-1 seems identical to ash 20020731-3,
> this seems to indicate a build and/or cygwin problem...

It's a situation which is determined by coincidence...

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -