Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Rolf Campbell <Endlisnis AT mailc DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
Date:	Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:44:08 -0400
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<bguh6i$gfo$1@main.gmane.org>
References:	<3F30D849 DOT 8D2AA00C AT itsec-ss DOT nl> <bgsa5k$39n$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <3F324535 DOT B10AA62D AT itsec-ss DOT nl> <bgtree$r7r$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <20030807154057 DOT GB1689 AT redhat DOT com> <3F327990 DOT 4050104 AT cs DOT york DOT ac DOT uk> <20030807181734 DOT GA3794 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
In-Reply-To:	<20030807181734.GA3794@redhat.com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> As described, the memory leak is obviously not in cygwin.  It is in
> windows.  I was adding some clarification to the issue by changing a
> "may be" to a "definitely is".
> 
> I think that this kind of clarification is more useful than your
> message, which essentially says "If we could figure out what was causing
> the problem then maybe it could be fixed".  Personally, I don't see how
> that observation is useful.
> 
> Having had some experience with this, I find it highly doubtful that any
> useful data will come from people posting their "me too" experiences.
> If someone wants to fix this then researching the Microsoft Knowledge
> Base might be a place to start.  A google search might also be helpful.

Could it be *possible* that cygwin leaves some memory allocated?  Does 
windows claim to free all memory allocated by a process when it exits? 
What about cygwin shared memory?

I'm not claiming it's a cygwin problem, I'm just curious.

-Rolf



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -