Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Robert Mecklenburg <mecklen AT cimsoft DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<16178.36566.869000.847114@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date:	Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:39:34 -0600
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug in make?
In-Reply-To:	<20030806184100.GA16284@redhat.com>
References:	<20030806184100 DOT GA16284 AT redhat DOT com>

IP> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:27:02PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
IP> This could well be a bug in make.  I'll take a look at the make source
IP> later to see whether there's something obvious.

CF> You might want to hop over to the gnu web site and check out the make
CF> mailing list to see if this is a known problem.

I looked at the bug tracking list on savannah and didn't see any open
bugs relating to this issue.  I just tried searching bug-make AT gnu DOT org
but didn't find anything relevant.  There were a lot of (old) posts
about an unrelated echo suppression bug in define/endef sequences in
3.79 which made it difficult to be sure.

I didn't send the message to bug-make because a) the identical
makefile behaves as expected on our local GNU/Linux box (with make
3.80) and b) I had the vague impression that cygwin make was modified
enough that Paul Smith (make maintainer) would just bounce it back
here.

I'll post the original bug report to make-w32 and see what they say.

Thanks,
-- 
Robert


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -