Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:13:40 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.5.1 libc.a link problem
Message-ID:	<20030806201339.GB1436@tishler.net>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030805190957 DOT GA2180 AT tishler DOT net> <20030805202015 DOT GA7981 AT redhat DOT com> <20030806035851 DOT GA3943 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030806035851.GA3943@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

Chris,

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:58:51PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 04:20:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:09:57PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >>But, if one builds it with -lc, we get the following:
> >>
> >>    $ gcc -o stat stat.c -lc
> >>    $ objdump -p stat.exe | fgrep stat
> >>            6130      945  stat
> >
> >Ok.  Interesting.  I know what the problem is.  Should be "easy" to
> >fix.
> >
> >Sounds like we need a 1.5.2.
> 
> Oh yeah.  That was wicked easy.
> 
> Can someone confirm or deny that the latest snapshot solves this
> problem?

AFAICT, the above works correctly under the latest snapshot (i.e., with
just libc.a replaced).

Thanks,
Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -