Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Robert Mecklenburg <mecklen AT cimsoft DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<16177.22287.680000.491661@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:29:19 -0600
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug in make?
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0308061415490.24886-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References:	<16177 DOT 16290 DOT 104000 DOT 310212 AT gargle DOT gargle DOT HOWL>
	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0308061415490 DOT 24886-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>

RM> Has anyone seen this problem before? ...
RM> 
RM> make
RM> 
RM> @echo hi
RM> /bin/bash: line 1: @echo: command not found
RM> make: *** [a] Error 127

IP> FYI, any shell (I tried /bin/sh, /bin/tcsh, etc) tries to execute '@echo',
IP> with the obvious result.  

Of course, I thought that was self-evident so I didn't remark on it.
The issue is that make _should_ process the @ and does if the case is
simplified any further.


IP> However, changing the shell to ' /bin/bash -x' might prove
IP> instructive.

Good point, I didn't do that.  The output is:

make SHELL=~/bin/echo-bash -f make-define-bug.mk

  @echo hi
+ bash -c '@echo hi'
bash: line 1: @echo: command not found
make: *** [a] Error 127

I'm not sure what I was supposed to see.  I know the @ is being passed
to the shell.  Or did I miss something?


IP> It seems the blank line (anywhere in the sequence) confuses the define
IP> processor in make and makes it forgo the processing of the prefix
IP> characters after the blank line.  This could well be a bug in
IP> make.

Yes, that's what I think.  But I suspect it is specific to cygwin, the
same makefile works fine on our local GNU/Linux box.

Thanks for looking into it.  As always cygwin rules!

Cheers,
-- 
Robert


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -