Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs
Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:59:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	Jon LaBadie <jcyg AT jgcomp DOT com>
cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: What is the minimum needed to run gtar?
In-Reply-To:	<20030806174506.GA25006@butch.jgcomp.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0308061358330.24886-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
Importance:	Normal
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Jon LaBadie wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:27:11PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
> > Oh, OK.  I didn't know that this was a restatement of that problem
> > (<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-07/msg00932.html>).  Did you try
> > running tar on the affected systems with strace?  Perhaps a comparison
> > of the output from a machine where it's failing and the same from one
> > that doesn't would provide some insight.
> >
> >
> > Biederman, Steve wrote:
> >
> > >For a good, concise example and test case, go back to the problem I posted
> > >on 7/16, titled "tar 1.13.25 runs forever and produces nothing on this
> > >test case".
> > >
> > >That behavior is seen on a bare Windows machine with no Cygwin installed
> > >but for tar 1.13.25 and cygwin1.dll.
> > >
> > >When I installed a Cygwin build environment in order to debug the problem,
> > >the problem disappeared.  But its easily reproduced on a bare Windows
> > >machine.
> > >
> > >
> > >Biederman, Steve wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>I want to allow the users I support to be able to run Cygwin tar on their
> > >>Windows machines.
> > >>These machines have not had any Cygwin installed; they're just bare
> > >>Windows machines.
> > >>
> > >>I provided them tar.exe and cygwin1.dll and assumed that with these, they
> > >>could run
> > >>Cygwin tar sucessfully.  It appears that that isn't the case: machines
> > >>without Cygwin installed see different behavior than machines which have
> > >>it installed.  (Running tar
> > >>on machines without Cygwin installed creates incorrect tar archives.)
> > >>
> > >>What is the minimum I need to provide to a non-Cygwin Windows machine to
> > >>get
> > >>Cygwin tar to run reliably?
>
> This may not be apropos today ...
>
> Several years ago I was trying something similar, get a minimum,
> standalone amanda distribution.  The distributed gtar was not yet
> 1.13.25 so I compiled my own.  It needed another cygwin provided
> dll besides cygwin1.dll.  Sorry I don't recall which one, nor do
> I know if that requirement still exists.
>
> jl

Build gtar, then "cygcheck gtar.exe".  It relies on all the DLLs you see
in the output.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -