Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	localhost.localdomain: ronald set sender to blytkerchan AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net using -f
Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:19:15 +0200
From:	Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <blytkerchan AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Yes but I don't understand ...
Message-ID:	<20030806091915.GE15632@linux_rln.harvest>
References:	<IHEAIGJEFNKKKDPFCPECAENNCBAA DOT dockeen AT mchsi DOT com> <20030806023748 DOT GA19231 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030806023748.GA19231@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i
X-Disclaimer:	I had nothing to do with it - I swear!
X-loop:	linux_rln.harvest

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:37:48PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:07:46PM -0500, Wayne wrote:
> >I thought it went like this:
> >
> >In the beginning, there was B20, and it was GOOD.  After that, it went
> >downhill...
> 
> That raises the age old question of "If there was a B20, what about B19?
> Why are there ChangeLog entries for earlier versions?"
I've always considered the before-B20 part of the Changelog "Genesis"..

With the imminent coming of 1.5.x (the Messiah?) the New Testament is about
to start.

[snipped the rest - I'm not a Darwinist (but I *am* a biologist!)]

rlc


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -