Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	localhost.localdomain: ronald set sender to blytkerchan AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net using -f
Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:10:15 +0200
From:	Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <blytkerchan AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.5.1 libc.a link problem
Message-ID:	<20030806091015.GD15632@linux_rln.harvest>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030805190957 DOT GA2180 AT tishler DOT net> <20030805202015 DOT GA7981 AT redhat DOT com> <20030806035851 DOT GA3943 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030806035851.GA3943@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i
X-Disclaimer:	I had nothing to do with it - I swear!
X-loop:	linux_rln.harvest

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:58:51PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 04:20:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:09:57PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >>While attempting to rebuild procmail against Cygwin 1.5.1, I believe I
> >>have found a problem with libc.a that interferes with building 64-bit
> >>apps.
> >>
> >>If one builds the attached test program without -lc, we get the
> >>following:
> >>
> >>    $ gcc -o stat stat.c
> >>    $ objdump -p stat.exe | fgrep stat
> >>            6100      510  _stat64
> >>
> >>But, if one builds it with -lc, we get the following:
> >>
> >>    $ gcc -o stat stat.c -lc
> >>    $ objdump -p stat.exe | fgrep stat
> >>            6130      945  stat
> >
> >Ok.  Interesting.  I know what the problem is.  Should be "easy" to fix.
> >
> >Sounds like we need a 1.5.2.
> 
> Oh yeah.  That was wicked easy.
> 
> Can someone confirm or deny that the latest snapshot solves this
> problem?
Unless I did something wrong, I guess I'll have to deny it..
I installed the complete snapshot (cygwin-inst) and get the same
results as before.

HTH

rlc

-- 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -