Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 5 Aug 2003 23:58:51 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-idd AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.5.1 libc.a link problem
Message-ID:	<20030806035851.GA3943@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030805190957 DOT GA2180 AT tishler DOT net> <20030805202015 DOT GA7981 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030805202015.GA7981@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 04:20:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:09:57PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>>While attempting to rebuild procmail against Cygwin 1.5.1, I believe I
>>have found a problem with libc.a that interferes with building 64-bit
>>apps.
>>
>>If one builds the attached test program without -lc, we get the
>>following:
>>
>>    $ gcc -o stat stat.c
>>    $ objdump -p stat.exe | fgrep stat
>>            6100      510  _stat64
>>
>>But, if one builds it with -lc, we get the following:
>>
>>    $ gcc -o stat stat.c -lc
>>    $ objdump -p stat.exe | fgrep stat
>>            6130      945  stat
>
>Ok.  Interesting.  I know what the problem is.  Should be "easy" to fix.
>
>Sounds like we need a 1.5.2.

Oh yeah.  That was wicked easy.

Can someone confirm or deny that the latest snapshot solves this
problem?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -