Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/08/05/22:52:28
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:37:53PM -0400, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>Le lun 04 ao? 2003 20:05:45 GMT, Nicholas Wourms a tapot? sur son clavier :
>>That being said, My suggestion to Samuel would be to investigate the
>>FreeBSD cvs repo to see if they have implimented ftw() in their libc,
>>since they have a more "free" license and aren't GPL-infected.
>
>It seems to be still worked on, and not available in their cvs :/
What is with the selective reading style in this thread?
I saw that a referenced LGPL license is unacceptable for cygwin.
Gerrit responds with a pointer to a BSD licensed version. Asks if
it is acceptable.
I say probably but you'd have to ask the newlib mailing list.
Nicholas responds eight hours after this interchange. He opines that I
probably don't know about the Red Hat employees who run the glibc
project and offers that somebody should find a BSD licensed version of
ftw.
Now, a day later, we find that Gerrit's email has again been ignored
and the Wourms plan is unworkable.
Odd.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -