delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/08/05/17:31:15

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Info: This message was accepted for relay by
smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication
X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVZ/DVIATIFAWlNmcvCRYsyvnMvnOz0jOKn1PwbLL6gYcDbollLlK3E7
Message-ID: <3F302130.1030804@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 17:27:12 -0400
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug VanLeuven <roamdad AT attglobal DOT net>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Controversial what if.... we disable ntsec by default again?
References: <02f301c35b4a$8e792f40$017c883e AT starfruit> <3F2FB51D DOT 2090309 AT attglobal DOT net> <20030805163039 DOT GA3817 AT redhat DOT com> <3F301A46 DOT 9070206 AT attglobal DOT net>
In-Reply-To: <3F301A46.9070206@attglobal.net>

Doug VanLeuven wrote:

> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:46:05AM -0700, Doug VanLeuven wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Why isn't ntsec a mount option?
>>>   
>>
>>
>> The standard reason.
>>  
>>
> 
> Which is the standard reason?
> 1. It's that way because nobody has coded it yet.
> 2. It's that way because the core team analyzed it and believe it is 
> best done the way it is.
> 


The standard reason is "because we're mean".

To answer your question about which of the two options above explain
why 'ntsec' is not a mount option, the answer is both.  Of course, if
someone contributes (1) and it's convincing, then that just means that
(2) now applies to this new implementation.  :-)


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019