delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Info: | This message was accepted for relay by |
smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication | |
X-Trace: | UmFuZG9tSVZ/DVIATIFAWlNmcvCRYsyvnMvnOz0jOKn1PwbLL6gYcDbollLlK3E7 |
Message-ID: | <3F302130.1030804@cygwin.com> |
Date: | Tue, 05 Aug 2003 17:27:12 -0400 |
From: | Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 |
X-Accept-Language: | en-us, en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | Doug VanLeuven <roamdad AT attglobal DOT net> |
CC: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Controversial what if.... we disable ntsec by default again? |
References: | <02f301c35b4a$8e792f40$017c883e AT starfruit> <3F2FB51D DOT 2090309 AT attglobal DOT net> <20030805163039 DOT GA3817 AT redhat DOT com> <3F301A46 DOT 9070206 AT attglobal DOT net> |
In-Reply-To: | <3F301A46.9070206@attglobal.net> |
Doug VanLeuven wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:46:05AM -0700, Doug VanLeuven wrote: >> >> >>> Why isn't ntsec a mount option? >>> >> >> >> The standard reason. >> >> > > Which is the standard reason? > 1. It's that way because nobody has coded it yet. > 2. It's that way because the core team analyzed it and believe it is > best done the way it is. > The standard reason is "because we're mean". To answer your question about which of the two options above explain why 'ntsec' is not a mount option, the answer is both. Of course, if someone contributes (1) and it's convincing, then that just means that (2) now applies to this new implementation. :-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |