delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3F301A46.9070206@attglobal.net> |
Date: | Tue, 05 Aug 2003 13:57:42 -0700 |
From: | Doug VanLeuven <roamdad AT attglobal DOT net> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401 |
X-Accept-Language: | en-us, en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Controversial what if.... we disable ntsec by default again? |
References: | <02f301c35b4a$8e792f40$017c883e AT starfruit> <3F2FB51D DOT 2090309 AT attglobal DOT net> <20030805163039 DOT GA3817 AT redhat DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <20030805163039.GA3817@redhat.com> |
X-MailScanner: | Found to be clean |
Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:46:05AM -0700, Doug VanLeuven wrote: > > >>Why isn't ntsec a mount option? >> >> > >The standard reason. > > Which is the standard reason? 1. It's that way because nobody has coded it yet. 2. It's that way because the core team analyzed it and believe it is best done the way it is. -- Doug VanLeuven : 707-545-6945 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Programmer/Analyst, SCWA : doug AT scwa DOT ca DOT gov Chief Engineer, USMM : roamdad AT attglobal DOT net -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |