Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3F2EA79A.7030505@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Mon, 04 Aug 2003 14:36:10 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.5.1 issue?
References:	<20030804160631 DOT GA9256 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0308041403220 DOT 27389-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0308041403220.27389-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
X-Virus-Scanned:	by amavisd-new
X-SPAM:	NO

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

> FWIW, I've seen this in 1.3.22 (with both "tty" and "notty"), so it's not
> a regression.

Okay, if it's not a regression then it is not a "1.5.1 issue" per se. 
Party on, dudes.

As far as "seen this on linux" -- I had never seen it before(*) on linux 
or cygwin, so I thought I'd simply give a heads up.  If it's a known 
issue (and apparently it is, and not just for cygwin), then I'm sorry 
for the noise.

(*) I *have* seen it on cygwin snapshots before, but never on released 
kernels.  I guess I've just been lucky, but my previous experience 
pointed to "something that occassionally went wrong during development 
cycle but was usually fixed by release time".  I was wrong; sorry for 
the confusion.

--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -