Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:51:30 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-idd AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ftw()
Message-ID:	<20030804165130.GF9385@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030803214853 DOT GC14139 AT bouh DOT unh DOT edu> <20030804012949 DOT GE14139 AT bouh DOT unh DOT edu> <20030804013826 DOT GB7673 AT redhat DOT com> <1201483256630 DOT 20030804165421 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20030804160121 DOT GA9136 AT redhat DOT com> <1601489746832 DOT 20030804184231 AT familiehaase DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1601489746832.20030804184231@familiehaase.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 06:42:31PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Am Montag, 4.  August 2003 um 18:01 schriebst du:
>>Just to be clear: I'm not volunteering to do any work on this other
>>than offer opinions on whether the code is appropriate for inclusion
>>for cygwin.
>
>And, is this BSD version appropriate for inclusion for Cygwin (or
>Newlib)?

Probably.  Only the newlib mailing list would know for sure.
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -