Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Info:	This message was accepted for relay by
	smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication
X-Trace:	UmFuZG9tSVYzF4/5fDJwZzS7s5/ktxTYGpZjhDvqU4j7JZvRIdsiOjO7lLuDmxqj
Message-ID:	<3F2C0377.4080609@cygwin.com>
Date:	Sat, 02 Aug 2003 14:31:19 -0400
From:	Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT pusspaws DOT net
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: vim speed issue
References:	<3F2B6994 DOT 7000302 AT pusspaws DOT net> <3F2BFB61 DOT 9090609 AT cygwin DOT com> <3F2C00C7 DOT 7060703 AT pusspaws DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<3F2C00C7.7060703@pusspaws.net>

David Selby wrote:

> 
> 
> Larry Hall wrote:
> 
>> David Selby wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> OK newbe cygwin user here, have read manual + faq ... so not just 
>>> lept in with a question !
>>>
>>> I have a 700MHz PIII 256MB, I have installed cygwin on 98SE.
>>> When running it can seem a little slow, ie "man man" takes 2-3 
>>> seconds, vim screen ripples as I scroll up.
>>>
>>> In the FAQ it states that upgrades can have speed problems, This is a 
>>> new install.
>>>
>>> Is it a case of cygwin is just another process as far as 98SE is 
>>> concerned & so only gets a slice of CPU time ? In which case AOK, no 
>>> probs I can live with it. Or is there something I need to tweak ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, cygwin proggies are just other processes, just like Windows
>> proggies. Don't know why knowing that would make you feel better
>> about the perceived performance problem. But there you are. :-)
>>
>> I'd suggest reviewing the text at <http://cygwin.com/problems.html>.
>>
>> Win 9x/Me console output is slow and inefficient, though I think what
>> you describe is extreme (don't know for sure since I don't use 9x/Me).
>> It may be a configuration issue. One way to narrow things down would be
>> to try rxvt instead of the console Window. Many on Win9x/Me use this to
>> avoid the console shortcomings. Some use it on NT/W2K/XP too. ;-) See:
>>
>> Is there a better alternative to the standard console window?
>> <http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_toc.html#TOC66> 
> 
> 
> 
> Many thanks for getting back to me. I was unsure if it was a config 
> problem just for me or a general thing. My guess is it cant realy be 
> that slow, how would it run X ? (If this is a dumb statement bourne of 
> ignorance of cygwin, forgive me!)
> 
> Anyhow I will try your suggestion and try rxvt,
> Thanks once again
> Dave


Right.  vim works great here on the console, but I'm running W2K.

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -